REPRESENTASI GENDER DAN KEKUASAAN DALAM “CANTIK ITU LUKA” MELALUI ARTIKULA SI & SANG

Penulis

  • Adityarini Kusumaningtyas, S.Pd., M.Hum. Universitas Khairun Penulis
  • Roni Kurniawan, S.Pd., M.Pd. Universitas Khairun Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/b4arhg11

Kata Kunci:

Analisis wacana kritis, linguistik korpus, relasi kuasa, stereotip gender, Corpus linguistics; critical discourse analysis; gender stereotype; power relations

Abstrak

ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini menganalisis dinamika kekuasaan dan stereotip gender dalam novel Cantik Itu Luka karya Eka Kurniawan dengan menggunakan pendekatan linguistik korpus. Fokus kajian terletak pada penggunaan artikula si dan sang dalam merepresentasikan relasi kuasa serta konstruksi gender tokoh-tokohnya. Hasil analisis frekuensi dan konteks menunjukkan bahwa artikula si lebih sering dilekatkan pada tokoh-tokoh berstatus sosial rendah, khususnya perempuan yang digambarkan dalam posisi subordinat. Sebaliknya, artikula sang cenderung digunakan untuk tokoh laki-laki atau individu dengan status sosial tinggi sebagai penanda penghormatan dan otoritas. Temuan ini mencerminkan dominasi sistem patriarki dalam narasi novel, di mana laki-laki menempati profesi bergengsi, sedangkan perempuan digambarkan tidak bekerja atau memiliki atribut status yang rendah. Namun demikian, penggunaan artikula sang pada tokoh Dewi Ayu—seorang pekerja seks—menunjukkan penyimpangan dari pola tersebut. Meskipun pekerjaan tersebut secara sosial dipandang rendah, tokoh ini tetap diberi artikula yang biasanya dilekatkan pada figur yang dihormati. Hal ini dapat ditafsirkan sebagai strategi naratif yang menantang norma sosial konvensional, mengingat Dewi Ayu digambarkan sebagai perempuan yang memiliki keberanian dan otonomi untuk melampaui batas-batas kuasa yang secara sosial dikenakan pada perempuan. Temuan ini memperkuat kajian-kajian sebelumnya mengenai dominasi laki-laki dalam novel tersebut sekaligus menunjukkan bahwa bahasa dalam teks sastra tidak hanya merefleksikan struktur sosial, tetapi juga dapat berfungsi sebagai alat perlawanan terhadap stereotip gender.

 

KATA KUNCI: Analisis wacana kritis; linguistik korpus, relasi kuasa, stereotip gender

 

 

REPRESENTING GENDER AND POWER THROUGH THE ARTICLES SI AND SANG INCANTIK ITU LUKA

 

 

ABSTRACT: This study analyzes the dynamics of power and gender stereotypes in Eka Kurniawan’s novel “Cantik Itu Luka” using a corpus linguistics approach. The focus is on the use of the articles si and sang in representing power relations and gender constructions of the characters. Frequency and context analyses reveal that si is more frequently associated with characters of lower social status, particularly women depicted in subordinate positions. Conversely, sang is typically used for male characters or those with high social status, signaling respect and authority. These findings reflect the patriarchal system’s dominance within the novel’s narrative, where men occupy prestigious professions, while women are portrayed as unemployed or with low-status attributes. However, the use of sang for Dewi Ayu—a sex worker—deviates from this pattern. Despite her socially stigmatized occupation, she is assigned an article typically reserved for respected figures, which can be interpreted as a narrative strategy challenging conventional social norms. This suggests that Dewi Ayu embodies courage and autonomy, transcending socially imposed gender constraints. These findings reinforce previous studies on male dominance in the novel while demonstrating that language in literary texts not only reflects social structures but can also serve as a tool for resisting gender stereotypes.

 

KEYWORDS: Corpus linguistics; critical discourse analysis; gender stereotype; power relations

Diterima:

12 Agustus 2025

Direvisi:

26 September 2025

Disetujui:

27 September 2025

Dipublikasi:

30 Oktober 2025

Pustaka: Kusumaningtyas, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2025). Representasi gender dan kekuasaan dalam "Cantik Itu Luka" melalui artikulasi si & sang. Jurnal Fon Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 21(2), 511-525.

 Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Ahlijah, J. C., & Kubi, B. (2023). The Portrayal of Gender in Kofi Nyaku’s Amedzro Etɔ̃lia: A Feminist Approach. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 5(12), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.12.4

Anthony, L. (2023). Antconc (4.2.4). Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Ashrafova, I. (2024). Language and Gender: Exploring Structures and Bias in Linguistic Norms. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.024048

Auma, K., & Okumu, C. N. (2024). Gender stereotype in Tess of The D’urbervilles by Thomas Hardy and The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald. East Africa Journal of Education Studies, 7(4), 75–87. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.7.4.2222

Brezina, V. (2018). Introduction: Statistics meets corpus linguistics. In Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899.002

Budilova, O., Volkova, M., Honsalies-Munis, S., Aksiutina, T., & Vovkodav, O. (2024). Gender Identity and Literary Expression: Examining the intersection of literature and sociocultural shifts. Traduction et Langues, 23(03), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.52919/translang.v23i03.1015

Connor, P., Varney, J., Keltner, D., & Chen, S. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89–105.

Durante, F., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality. Curr Opin Psychol, 18, 43–48.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Foucault, M. (1998). The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge. Penguin.

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentie-Hall.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Anchor Books.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Hasan, A. M. M. M. (2023). The Role of Gender and Power in Jane Austen’s Novels. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0240

Kridalaksana, H. (1999). Tata wacana deskriptif bahasa Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia.

Kurniawan, E. (2015). Cantik itu luka. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ladzekpo, G., Attiye, J., & Davi, S. (2024). Exploring Gender Roles and Stereotypes in Literature: An Analysis of Contemporary Works. International Journal of Gender Studies, 9(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijgs.2782

Levinson, S. C. (1989). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Mahdi, W. (2001). Personal nominal words in Indonesian: an anomaly in morphological classification. In J. Bradshaw & K. Rehg (Eds.), Issues in Austronesian Morphology: A festschrift for Byron W. Bender (pp. 163–192). https://doi.org/DOI:10.15144/PL-519.163

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Moeliono, A. M., Lapoliwa, H., Alwi, H., Sasangka, S. S. T. W., & Sugiyono. (2017). Tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia (4th ed.). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Munyangeyo, T. (2023). Socio-Cultural Shifts in The Representation of Gender (In)Equality in Africa. International Journal of African Society, Cultures and Traditions, 11(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijasct.2014/vol11n26176

Persada, M. P., & Legowo, M. (2021). Labelling masyarakat terhadap anak pekerja seks komersial di Jombang. Paradigma, 10(1).

Poynter, E. (2020). Aggressive but loyal. Gender and Language, 14(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.38577

Purfitasari, S. (2014). Prostitusi Keling (Konstruksi sosial masyarakat dan stigmatisasi). Journal of Educational Social Studies, 3(2), 44–50.

Rifai, R. U., Idawati, & Faisal. (2023). Representasi feminisme dalam novel “Cantik Itu Luka” karya Eka Kurniawan (kajian semiotika Roland Barthes). Titik Dua, 3(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.59562/titikdua.v3i2.47102

Shakoor, S., Ajmal, M., & Ghazanfar, S. (2023). Linguistic Construction of Women: A Feminist Stylistic Study of Aysha Baqir’s Beyond the Fields. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(IV). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-IV)09

Sreevarsha. G. (2023). GENDER SENSITIZATION THROUGH LITERATURE – NEW APPROACHES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.2146

Tektigul, Z., Bayadilova-Altybayeva, A., Sadykova, S., Iskindirova, S., Kushkimbayeva, A., & Zhumagul, D. (2023). Language is a symbol system that carries culture. International Journal of Society, Culture, & Language IJCL, 11(1), 204–214.

Utari, D., Amrizal, & Chanafiah, Y. (2022). Cerminan feminisme dalam novel “Cantik Itu Luka” karya Eka Kurniawan. Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, 6(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v6i3.27096

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Red Globe Press.

Wardaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Wiyatmi. (2009). Representasi peran dan relasi gender dalam novel “Cantik Itu Luka” karya Eka Kurniawan dan novel “Nayla” karya Djenar Maesa Ayu. Litera, 8(1), 82–92.

Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and Discourse. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250204

Zahoor, S., Sana, Zaibunnisa, & Zaidi, S. M. M. (2024). How languages constructs gender roles and reflects power dynamics in literatures, exploring speech acts, conversational dominance, and stereotypes. RAMMS: Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 7(4), 759–776.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

04-12-2025

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

REPRESENTASI GENDER DAN KEKUASAAN DALAM “CANTIK ITU LUKA” MELALUI ARTIKULA SI & SANG. (2025). Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 21(2), 511-525. https://doi.org/10.25134/b4arhg11