THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SIMULATION AND INDEPENDENT STUDY METHODS ON THE ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THE STRUCTURE AND RULES OF EXPOSITION TEXTS IN GRADE 10 STUDENTS OF SMAN 2 KUNINGAN IN THE 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR

Authors

  • Ajat Sudrajat Universitas Kuningan Author
  • Desye Sagita Naryanti Universitas Kuningan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/bd5wxh07

Keywords:

simulation method, independent learning method, structure and rules of expository text, class X students of SMAN 2 Kuningan

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences between simulation methods and independent study methods on the ability to understand the structure and rules of exposition texts of class X students of SMAN 2 Kuningan. Simulation methods emphasize student collaboration in solving problems, while independent study emphasizes student independence in solving problems. The development of problem-solving skills is an implication of the development of critical thinking skills, therefore researchers want to develop these skills. Problem Formulation. 1) How is the ability to understand the structure and rules of exposition texts using independent study methods in class X students of SMAN 2 Kuningan in the 2013/2014 academic year?; 2) How is the ability to understand the structure and rules of exposition texts using simulation methods in class X students of SMAN 2 Kuningan in the 2013/2014 academic year?; 3) Is there a difference between simulation methods and independent study methods on the ability to understand the structure and rules of exposition texts in class X students of SMAN 2 Kuningan in the 2013/2014 academic year?; This study uses experimental research methods and the type of research uses quantitative research. The sample used in this study was two classes, namely class A as the control class with 34 students and class B as the experimental class with 34 students. The results of the statistical test showed that z count > z table with a value of 2.29 > 2.23, so the hypothesis H1:  > 6.7 was accepted. The results of the t test showed that the z count value was greater than z table. So it can be concluded that the use of simulation learning methods has a significant influence on students' critical thinking skills. This result is in accordance with the average value of students' critical thinking abilities which exceeds the minimum completeness criteria (KKM) which is 8.11 with a KKM of 7.6. So it can be concluded that the use of simulation learning methods and independent study learning methods has a significant difference in the ability to understand the structure and rules of students' exposition texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alwi, Hasan dkk. (2010). Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Arifin, Zaenal dan Amran Tasai. Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia. Edisi revisi: 2008. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2005. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Cetakan XII(2011). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ary, Donald, Luchy Cheser Jacobs dan Asghar Razavieh. Cetakan III(2007). Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan.Penerj: Furchan, Arief. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Daniel Goleman. 2002. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algasindo.

Daniel Goleman. 2002. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algasindo.

Fitri Hindriana, Ana. 2006. Statistik. FKIP Universitas Kuningan.

Hamdani.(2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Heryadi, Dedi. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Pusbill.

http://share.pdfonline.com/0d171683db6b47008eb74ae3168e83f1/PENINGKATAN%20KETERAMPILAN%20MENULIS%20PARAGRAF%20EKSPOSISI.htm (diakses 1 Februari 2013)

Mansurudin, Susili.(2010). Mozaik Bahasa Indonesia. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

Nuryani. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Rahardi, Kunjana.(2009). Penyuntingan Bahasa Indonesia untuk Karang-Mengarang. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2009. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta : Kencana.

Sudjana. 2004. Metoda Statistika. Bandung : Tarsito

Sugiyono. 2007. Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung : Alfabet

Sugiyono.(2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Zaini, Hisyam. 2008. “Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif”. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Insan Madani

Zainurrahman.(2011). Menulis: Dari Teori Hingga praktik(penawar racun plagiarisme). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Published

04-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SIMULATION AND INDEPENDENT STUDY METHODS ON THE ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND THE STRUCTURE AND RULES OF EXPOSITION TEXTS IN GRADE 10 STUDENTS OF SMAN 2 KUNINGAN IN THE 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEAR. (2025). Fon: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.25134/bd5wxh07