A STUDY OF LANGUAGE VARIATION IN STATUS POSTS MADE BY TWITTER USERS JOINING SAQINAA MELISA'S TWITTER ACCOUNT JANUARY 2014

Authors

  • Asep Jejen Jaelani Universitas Kuningan Author
  • Saqina Melisa Universitas Kuningan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/e1en4723

Keywords:

language variations, twitter account

Abstract

The national language in Indonesia is Indonesian, the emergence of language variations used in the status of Twitter users is clearly damaging the national language. For this reason, researchers feel compelled to conduct research on "A Study of Language Variations in Statuses Created by Twitter Users Who Joined the Saqinaa Melisa Twitter Account in the January 2014 Period". Based on this background, the problems of this research are 1) What language variations are used in the statuses created by Twitter users who joined the Saqina Melisa Twitter account in the January 2014 period? 2) What language variations are most often used in the statuses created by Twitter users who joined the Saqinaa Melisa Twitter account in the January 2014 period? The method used in this research is a qualitative descriptive method. The techniques used in this research are data acquisition techniques using literature studies, and documentation techniques. The population in this research is the statuses created by Twitter users who joined the Saqinaa Melisa Twitter account in the January 2014 period, totaling 477 pieces. The sample taken in this study was only 114 statuses, the researcher used a sampling technique based on the purpose, namely a purposive sample. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that 1) The language variations used in the statuses made by Twitter users who joined the Saqinaa Melisa Twitter account in the January 2014 period are variations of Slang / Prokem and Acrolect. 2) The most widely used language variations in the statuses made by Twitter users who joined the Saqinaa Melisa Twitter account in the January 2014 period are variations of Slang / Prokem. Of the 114 statuses used as research samples, 74 statuses are included in the Slang / Prokem language variations, and 40 other statuses are included in the acrolect language variations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyadi, Didi. (2006). Linguistik Umum. Kuningan :Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT RINEKA CIPTA.

Chaer, Abdul danAgustina, Leonie.(2010). Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta :RinekaCipta.

Ensiklopedi Kebahasaan Indonesia.

Heryadi, Dedi. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung : PUSBILL – Bandung.

IDE Media Solution.(2011). Sejarah Twitter dan Penemunya Jack Dorsey. (online). Tersedia :http://www.idewp.com/id/sejarah-twitter-dan-penemunya-jack-dorsey - html [8Juni 2011].

Juniar, Rizal. (2013). Kegunaan Twitter. (online). Tersedia :http://www.rijalj.blogspot.com– html [10 Januari 2013].

Maryani, (2009).Twitter dan Istilah yang Dipergunakan dalam Twitter. (online). Tersedia :http://www.maryani.blogapot.com - html [5 Desember 2009].

Nababan, P.W.J. (1984). Sosiolinguistik Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta : PT Gramedia.

Sumarsono, (2013).Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta : SABDA (Lembaga Studi Agama, Budaya dan Perdamaian).

Published

04-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A STUDY OF LANGUAGE VARIATION IN STATUS POSTS MADE BY TWITTER USERS JOINING SAQINAA MELISA’S TWITTER ACCOUNT JANUARY 2014. (2025). Fon: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/e1en4723