TYPES OF LANGUAGE STYLES USED BY INDONESIAN FOOTBALL REPORTERS IN THE FINAL MATCH OF THE ISL (INDONESIA SUPER LEAGUE) 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/3bpb5590Keywords:
types of language styles, reporter, ISL 2014 matchesAbstract
The formulation of the problem in this study are: 1) what types of language styles are used by football reporters in the 2014 ISL final match between PERSIB Bandung and PERSIPURA Jayapura; 2) what language styles are most dominantly used by football reporters in the 2014 ISL final match between PERSIB Bandung and PERSIPURA Jayapura? The method used in this study is descriptive analysis. The conclusion of this study is 1) 62 utterances of language styles were found delivered by reporter Hadi Ahay Gunawan consisting of 2 similes, 21 metaphors, 2 personifications, 1 antithesis, 3 pleonasms, 1 correction, 4 hyperboles, 1 irony, 4 inuendos, 1 hypalase, 1 synecdoche, 4 ellipsis, 1 eponym, 1 antonomasia, 10 erotesis, 3 epizeukis, 1 anaphora, and 1 epanalepsis. And 35 utterances containing language styles delivered by reporter Titis Sudjiatmoko consist of 1 simile language style, 5 metaphor language styles, 1 personification language style, 1 antithesis language style, 1 anticipation language style, 1 correction language style, 2 hyperbole language styles, 1 litotes language style, 1 inuendo language style, 5 climax language styles, 1 antonomasia language style, 3 erotesis language styles, 4 asyndeton language styles, 2 alliteration language styles, 4 anaphora language styles, and 1 epistrofa language style. 2) The most dominant language style used by football reporter Hadi Ahay Gunawan in the 2014 ISL final football match between PERSIB Bandung and PERSIPURA Jayapura is the Metaphor language style, which is 30%. And the most dominant language style used by football reporter Titis Sudjiatmoko in the 2014 ISL final football match between PERSIB Bandung and PERSIPURA Jayapura is the metaphorical language style and the climax language style, both of which have the same percentage, namely 14%.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, Abdul dan Leoni Agustina. (2010). Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, Abdul. (2013). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.
Heryadi, Dedi (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung : Puspill-Bandung.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_arZB0yYWs
Keraf, Gorys.(1994).Komposisi.Jakarta:Ikrar mandiri Abadi.
Keraf, Gorys. (2008). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta : Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Muhamad. (2011). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jogjakarta : Ar-ruzz Media.
Sugianto Mas, Aan. (2010). Langkah Awal Menuju Apresiasi Sastra. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Kuningan.
Sugiyono, Dendy. (2011). Buku Praktis Bahasa Indonesia Jilid 1. Jakarta : Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. (1995). Pengajaran Semantika. Bandung : Penerbit Angkasa.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. (2013). Pengajaran Gaya Bahasa Indoneisa. Bandung : Penerbit Angkasa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.