DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING OUTCOMES IN FINDING MAIN IDEAS IN DISCOURSE USING THE MAKE A MATCH LEARNING METHOD AND THE TALKING STICK LEARNING METHOD IN GRADE VII STUDENTS OF MTS DARUSSALAM JAPARA IN THE 2014/2015 ACADEMIC YEAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/p4hdc437Keywords:
difference, learning outcomes, metode make a match, metode talking stickAbstract
The title of this research is the difference in learning outcomes in finding the main idea in a discourse using the make a match learning method and the talking stick learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara in the academic year of 2014/2015. Problem formulation: 1) how are the learning outcomes in finding the main idea in a discourse using the make a match learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara in the academic year of 2014/2015?; 2) how are the learning outcomes in finding the main idea in a discourse using the talking stick learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara in the academic year of 2014/2015?; 3) is there a difference in learning outcomes in finding the main idea in a discourse using the make a match learning method and the talking stick learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara in the academic year of 2014/2015? Method: descriptive comparative. Conclusion: 1) the learning outcomes in finding the main idea in a discourse using the make a match learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara are less than the average value achieved, namely 50.70; 2) the learning outcomes of finding the main idea in the discourse using the talking stick learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara are sufficient, from the average value achieved which is 59.36; 3) there is a significant difference in the learning outcomes of finding the main idea in the discourse using the make a match learning method and the talking stick learning method in class VII students of MTs Darussalam Japara. This can be seen from the results of the hypothesis test which states that at a significance level of 5% obtained 2,000, while the calculated t value is greater at 3.09.
Downloads
References
Arifin, E. Zaenal dan S. Amran Tasai. (2009). Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Akademika Pressindo
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Heryadi, Dedi. (2008). Statistika Praktis untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Tasikmalaya: Universitas Kuningan
Heryadi, Dedi. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Tasikmalaya: Pustaka Billah
Hs, Widjono. (2007). Bahasa Indonesia Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Kepribadiaan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta : PT Grasindo
Huda, Miftahul. (2013). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset
Keraf, Gorys.(1979). Komposisi. Jakarta: Nusa Indah
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2008). Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Prihantini, Ainia. (2015). Master Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta : PT Bentang Pustaka
Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group
Sugiyono.(2013).Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : CV Alfabeta
Suprijono, Agus. (2011). Cooperative Learning Teori & Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Trianto.(2013). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara
Usman, Husaini dan Purnomo Setiady Akbar. (2011). Pengantar Statistik .Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara
Waluyo, Budi.(2013). Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Solo : PT Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mand
Yuliani, Yeni. (2013). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Question Student Have untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menemukan Gagasan Utama dalam Teks Wacana pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negri 2 Cigugur Kabupaten Kuningan Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Universitas Kuningan
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.