COMPARISON OF SK AND KD IN THE 2006 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS WITH KI AND KD IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE SUBJECT FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADE IX SEEN FROM THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES, SCOPE OF LANGUAGE S

Abstract

This research is a comparison of the results of the content analysis of SK and KD with KI and KD. Problem Formulation: 1) how is the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school?; 2) how is the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school?; 3) how is the comparison of the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school?; 4) how is the scope of language skills in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school?; 5) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for Grade IX Junior High School in terms of the scope of language skills?; 6) How does the scope of language science in the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for Grade IX Junior High School?; 7) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for Grade IX Junior High School in terms of the scope of language science?; 8) How does the scope of literature science in the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for Grade IX Junior High School?; 9) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for Grade IX Junior High School in terms of the scope of literary studies? Research Objectives: 1) to find out the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for Grade IX Junior High School; 2) want to know the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school; 3) want to know the comparison of the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school; 4) want to know the scope of language skills in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school; 5) want to know the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school seen from the scope of language skills; 6) want to know the scope of language science in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school; 7) want to know the comparison of SK and KD in the Curriculum Content Standards 2006 with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Junior High School Grade IX seen from the scope of linguistics; 8) want to know the scope of literary science in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Junior High School Grade IX; 9) want to know the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Junior High School Grade IX seen from the scope of literary science. Method: descriptive qualitative. Conclusion: 1) the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Junior High School Grade IX is that students are more emphasized in the cognitive domain of understanding, then psychomotor organization, and affective internalizing values; 2) The taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade IX junior high school is that students are more emphasized in the cognitive domain of understanding, then affective domain of internalizing values, and psychomotor domain of perception; 3) Comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in the 2006 curriculum SK and KD with the 2013 curriculum KI and KD is that the 2006 curriculum SK and KD are in the order of cognitive understanding, psychomotor organization, affective internalizing values, the 2013 curriculum KI and KD are in the order of cognitive understanding, affective internalizing values, psychomotor perception; 4) The scope of language skills in the 2013 curriculum KI and KD that are most studied are writing, then speaking, listening, reading; 5) Comparison of the 2006 curriculum SK and KD with the 2013 curriculum KI and KD seen from the scope of language skills is that the 2006 curriculum SK and KD are speaking, writing, reading, listening, while the 2013 curriculum KI and KD are writing, speaking, listening, reading; 6) The scope of language science in the 2013 curriculum KI and KD that are most studied are semantics, then syntax, phonology, morphology; 7) Comparison of the 2006 curriculum SK and KD with the 2013 curriculum KI and KD seen from the scope of language skills is that the 2006 curriculum SK and KD are speaking, writing, reading, listening, while the 2013 curriculum KI and KD are writing, speaking, listening, reading; 2006 with KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum, seen from the scope of linguistics, the SK and KD of the 2006 curriculum are in the order of syntax, phonology, semantics, morphology, while the KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum are in the order of semantics, syntax, phonology, morphology; 8) the scope of literary science in the KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum that is most studied is prosa fiction and drama, then poetry; 9) comparison of SK and KD of the 2006 curriculum with KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum seen from the scope of literary science is that SK and KD of the 2006 curriculum are in the order of prose fiction, drama, poetry, while KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum are in the order of prose fiction and drama, then poetry.