DIFFERENCES IN STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN UNDERSTANDING THE INTRINSIC ELEMENTS OF A STORY USING THE STUDENT FACILITATOR AND EXPLAINING (SFE) LEARNING METHOD AND THE COOPERATIVE SCRIPT METHOD IN GRADE X STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 LURAGUNG IN THE 2014/2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/awaf7e57Keywords:
difference, student learning outcomes, intrinsic elements of the tale, metode student facilitator and explaining, metode cooperative scriptAbstract
The title of this research is Differences in Student Learning Outcomes in Understanding the Intrinsic Elements of Hikayat Using the Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) Learning Method and the Cooperative Script Method in Grade X Students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 Academic Year. Problem Formulation: 1) How are the students' learning outcomes in understanding the intrinsic elements of hikayat using the student facilitator and explaining learning method in grade X students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 academic year? 2) How are the students' learning outcomes in understanding the intrinsic elements of hikayat using the cooperative script learning method in grade X students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 academic year? 3) Is there a difference in learning outcomes in understanding the intrinsic elements of hikayat using the student facilitator and explaining learning method and the cooperative script method in grade X students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 academic year? Method: descriptive comparative. Conclusion: 1) The students’ learning outcomes in understanding the intrinsic elements of the story using the student facilitator and explaining learning method in class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 academic year are good. This can be seen from the average value achieved, which is 76.42, which can be categorized as good; 2) The students’ learning outcomes in understanding the intrinsic elements of the story using the cooperative script learning method in class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 academic year are sufficient. This can be seen from the average value achieved, which is 68.63, which can be categorized as sufficient; 3) There is a significant difference between the students’ learning outcomes in understanding the intrinsic elements of the story using the student facilitator and explaining learning method and the cooperative script method in class X students of SMA Negeri 1 Luragung in the 2014/2015 academic year. This can be seen from the results of the difference test with the t-test which states that at a significance level of 0.05 (95% confidence level), the t-table result (2,000) < t-count (3.23). So the hypothesis is accepted.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ensiklopedi Sastra Indonesia.(2009).Bandung: Titian Ilmu.
Heryadi, Dedi. (2009). Statistika Praktis Untuk Penelitian Pendidikan Bahas.Tasikmalaya: Universitas Siliwangi.
Heryadi, Dedi.(2010).Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Tasikmalaya: Pustaka Billah.
Huda, Miftahul. (2013). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Mulyasa, Enco. (2010). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2010). PenilaianPembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi.Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan.(2010).Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Sugianto Mas, Aan.(2011).Langkah Awal Menuju Apresiasi Sastra Indonesia. Kuningan: FKIP Universitas Kuningan.
Sugianto Mas, Aan.(2012).Kajian Prosa Fiksi dan Drama. Kuningan: FKIP Universitas Kuningan.
Sugiono.(2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprijono, Agus.(2009).Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.