COMPARISON OF SK AND KD IN THE 2006 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS WITH KI AND KD IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE SUBJECT FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADE VII SEEN FROM THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES, SCOPE OF LANGUAGE

Abstract

The title of this research is Comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools seen from the taxonomy of learning objectives, the scope of language skills, linguistics, and literature. Problem formulation: 1) how is the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools?; 2) how is the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools?; 3) how is the comparison of the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools?; 4) how is the scope of language skills in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools? VII?;5) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools in terms of the scope of language skills?;6) How does the scope of language science in the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools in terms of the scope of language science?;7) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools in terms of the scope of language science?; 8) How is the scope of literary science in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for SMP Class VII?; 9) How is the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for SMP Class VII in terms of the scope of literary science? Research Objectives: 1) to find out the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for SMP Class VII; 2) to find out the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for SMP Class VII; 3) to find out the comparison of the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for SMP Class VII; 4) to find out the scope of language skills in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High School; 5) to find out the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High School seen from the scope of language skills; 6) to find out the scope of linguistics in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High School; 7) to find out the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools seen from the scope of linguistics; 8) to find out the scope of literary science in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools; 9) to find out the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools seen from the scope of literary science. Research Method: qualitative descriptive research method. Conclusion: 1) after being analyzed based on the researcher's perception of the contents of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian language subjects for Grade VII Junior High Schools regarding the taxonomy of learning objectives that are more dominant are the cognitive domain K2 (understanding), then psychomotor P3 (integrated response), and affective A2 (responding); 2) The taxonomy of learning objectives is found in the KI and KD of SMP/Mts Grade VII Indonesian language subjects in the 2013 curriculum, which is more dominant in the Cognitive domain K2 (understanding), then the Affective domain A2 (responding) and Psychomotor P7 (organization); 3) Comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives between SK and KD in the content standards of SMP/Mts Grade VII Indonesian language subjects in the 2006 curriculum and KI and KD in the content standards of SMP/Mts Grade VII Indonesian language subjects in the 2013 curriculum, namely both are more dominant in the Cognitive domain K2 (understanding). The difference lies in the next domain where SK and KD in the content standards for SMP/Mts Class VII Indonesian language subjects in the 2006 Curriculum (KTSP) are the next domains, namely the Psychomotor P3 (integrated response) and Affective A2 (responding) domains, while in KI and KD in the content standards for SMP/Mts Class VII Indonesian language subjects in the 2013 Curriculum the next domains are the Affective A2 (responding) and Psychomotor P7 (organization); 4) language skills contained in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum are in the order of speaking, writing, reading, and listening; 5) comparison of language skills between SK and KD and KI and n KD is the same, they both study more about speaking. It can be seen from the language skills in the SK and KD curriculum 2006 the order is speaking, writing, reading, and listening while the order in KI and KD curriculum 2013 is speaking, writing, reading, and listening; 6) linguistic science that is more dominant in KI and KD Curriculum 2013 is syntax/sentence, then semantics/meaning, morphology/words and phonology/segmental sounds and suprasegmental sounds; 7) comparison of the scope of linguistic science in SK and KD is the same, they study more about syntax/sentences. This can be seen from the order of linguistic coverage in SK and KD, namely linguistic science that includes in SK and KD the order is syntax/sentence, semantics/meaning, phonology/suprasegmental sounds (intonation, volume, stress), and morphology/words with a fairly far comparison between the languages. While in KI and KD the order is syntax/sentence, semantics/meaning, morphology/word and phonology/segmental sound and suprasegmental sound with a comparison that is not too far between the languages; 8) the scope of literary science contained in KI and KD is in the order of prose fiction/short stories, poetry, and drama; 9) comparison of the scope of literary science in SK and KD with KI and KD, namely both study more about prose fiction. However, in SK and KD literary science is studied clearly in contrast to KI and KD where literary science is not studied too deeply, mostly only used as a medium for conveying it. The order of literary scope in SK and KD is prosa fiction/fairy tales/short stories/children's stories/novels, and poetry.