COMPARISON OF SK AND KD IN THE 2006 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS WITH KI AND KD IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE SUBJECT FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADE VIII SEEN FROM THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES, SCOPE OF LANGUAGE

Abstract

The title of this research is a comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school seen from the taxonomy of learning objectives, language skills, linguistics and literary science. Problem formulation: 1) how is the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school?; 2) how is the taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school?; 3) how is the comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school?; 4) how is the scope of language skills in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school?; 5) How is the comparison between SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for the Indonesian language subject for grade VIII junior high school viewed from the scope of language skills?; 6) How is the scope of linguistics in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for the Indonesian language subject for grade VIII junior high school?; 7) How is the comparison between SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for the Indonesian language subject for grade VIII junior high school viewed from the scope of linguistics?; 8) How is the scope of literary studies in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for the Indonesian language subject for grade VIII junior high school?; 9) How is the comparison between SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school seen from the scope of literary science?. The purpose of the study: 1) to find out the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school.; 2) to find out the taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school.; 3) to find out the comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school.; 4) to find out the scope of language skills in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school.; 5) want to know the comparison between SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school seen from the scope of language skills.; 6) want to know the scope of linguistic science in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school.; 7) want to know the comparison between SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school seen from the scope of linguistic science.; 8) want to know the scope of literary science in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school.; 9) want to know the comparison between SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade VIII junior high school seen from the scope of literary science. Method: descriptive analytical. Conclusion: 1) The taxonomy of learning objectives included in the SK and KD of the 2006 curriculum content standard for the Indonesian language subject for grade VIII junior high school is in the order of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. 2) The taxonomy of learning objectives included in the KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum content standard for the Indonesian language subject for grade VIII junior high school is in the order of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. 3) The taxonomy of learning objectives in the SK and KD of the 2006 curriculum content standard is dominated by the cognitive domain as well as in the KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standard is dominated by the cognitive domain. 4) The language skills included in the KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum content standard are in the order of listening, reading, speaking, and writing. 5) The language skills in the SK and KD of the 2006 curriculum content standard that dominates is speaking skills. Meanwhile, in the KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standard that dominates is listening skills. 6) The linguistic sciences covered in the 2013 curriculum's standard core competencies (KI) and core competencies (KD) are semantics, syntax, morphology, and finally phonology. 7) The linguistic sciences in the 2006 curriculum's standard core competencies (SK) and core competencies (KD) are dominated by syntax. Meanwhile, semantics dominates in the 2013 curriculum's standard core competencies (KI) and core competencies (KD). 8) The literary sciences covered in the KI and core competencies are poetry, prose fiction, and drama. These three literary sciences are only used as supporting learning media. 9) Literary sciences The dominant content of literature in the 2006 curriculum's SK and KD is fictional prose. Meanwhile, in the KI and KD of the 2013 curriculum's SK and KD, literary science is not dominant.