COMPARISON OF SK AND KD IN THE 2006 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS WITH KI AND KD IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE SUBJECT FOR GRADE XII HIGH SCHOOL SEEN FROM THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES, SCOPE OF LANGUAGE SKILLS,

Authors

  • Aan Sugiantomas Universitas Kuningan Author
  • Asep Jejen Jaelani Universitas Kuningan Author
  • Ovia Nur Aeniroh Universitas Kuningan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/yc47k715

Keywords:

2006 curriculum content standards, 2013 curriculum content standards, Indonesian Language Subject for Senior High School Grade XII

Abstract

The title of this research is Comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language Subjects for Grade XII High School Viewed from the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives, Scope of Language Skills, Linguistics, and Literature. Problem Formulation: 1). How is the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade XII High School? 2). How is the taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade XII High School? 3). How is the comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade XII? 4). How is the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for Indonesian language subjects for grade XII High School viewed from the scope of language skills? 5). How do SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards compare with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for the Indonesian language subject for grade XII in terms of linguistics? 6). How do SK and KD in the 2006 curriculum content standards compare with KI and KD in the 2013 curriculum content standards for the Indonesian language subject for grade XII in terms of literary studies? This study aims to 1) determine the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of high school, 2) determine the taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of high school, 3) determine the comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of high school, 4) determine the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of high school seen from the scope of language skills, 5) determine the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of high school seen from the scope of linguistics, 6) determine Comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of SMA is mandatory seen from the scope of literary science. Method: qualitative. Conclusion: Taxonomy of Learning Objectives contained in the SKKD of the 2006 Curriculum and KIKD of the 2013 Curriculum for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XII of SMA (mandatory), apparently both dominate the Cognitive domain. The scope of language skills is evenly distributed into the SKKD of the 2006 curriculum content standard, while in the KI-KI of the 2013 curriculum content standard is more dominant in Speaking and Writing skills. The scope of linguistic science in the SKKD of the 2006 curriculum content standard is dominated by syntax and semantic linguistic science, while in the KI-KD of the 2013 curriculum content standard, linguistic science can be distributed evenly. The scope of literary poetry is more dominant in the 2006 curriculum content standard SK-KD, while in KI-KD it is dominated by fictional prose.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyadi, Didi. (2011). Linguistik Umum. Kuningan. Universitas Kuningan.

Arifin, E. Zaenal dan S. Amran Tasai. (2009). Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia.

Jakarta: AKAPRES.

Chaer, Abdul .(2009). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

__________ .(2009). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:Rineka

Cipta.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2010). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Heryadi, Dedi. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: Pustaka Billah.

Hidayat, Sholeh. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

IKAPI.(2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia tentang SISDIKNAS (Sistem Pendidikan Nasional). Bandung: Fokusmedia.

J.Waluyo, Herman. (1995). Teori dan Apresiasi Puisi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Keraf, Gorys. (1984). Tata Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Nusa Indah.

Kosasih, Engkos dan Hermawan, Wawan. (2012). Bahasa Indonesia (Berbasis Kepenulisan Karya Ilmiah dan Jurnal). Bandung: CV. Thursina.

Mulyasa, E. (2011).Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja.

Muslich, Masnur. (2012). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia: Tinjauan Deskriptif Sistem Bunyi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Mutiadi , Ahmad Dedi. (2012). Menyimak&Pengajarannya. Kuningan:

Universitas Kuningan.

Muzamiroh, Mida Latifatul. (2013). Kupas Tuntas Kurikulum 2013. Kata Pena.

Nurgiantoro, Burhan. (2010). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: BEFE-Yogyakarta.

Pateda, Mansoer. (1994). Linguistik (SebuahPengantar). Bandung: Angkasa.

Pidarta, Made. (2007). Landasan Pendidikan (Stimulus Pendidik Bercorak Indonesia.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ramlan. (2005). Sintaksis. Yogyakarta: CV. Karyono.

. (2009). Morfologi: Suatu Tinjauan Deskrptif. Yogyakarta: CV. Karyono.

Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Kurikulum Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

. (2013). Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sugiantomas, Aan. (2011). Langkah Awal Menuju Apresiasi Sastra. Kuningan: Universitas Kuningan.

. (2012). Kajian Prosa Fiksi (Materi Perkuliahan) Kuningan: Universitas Kuningan.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. (2008). Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

. (2008). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

. (2009). Pengajaran Sintaksis. Bandung: Angkasa.

TIM Penyusun. (2008). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:Pusat Bahasa

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional

Ullmann, Stephen. (2012). Pengantar Semantik. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Belajar.

Nuraliyah, Ely. (2012). “Analisis Sk Dan Kd Pada Standar Isi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Berdasarkan Keterampilan Berbahasa, Ilmu Kebahasaan, Dan Ilmu Kesastraan (Sebuah Analisis Isi SK dan KD Mendengarkan, Berbicara, Membaca, dan Menulis)”. Skripsi pada FKIP Universitas Kuningan: tidak diterbitkan.

Wigunawa, Kemis. (2014). Analisis Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMA Sekabupaten Kuningan Dalam Menjabarkan SK/KD Dilihat Dari Ilmu Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Indonesia. Skripsi pada FKIP Universitas Kuningan: tidak diterbitkan.

Kristian, Tia. (2014). Cakupan Ilmu Keterampilan Bebahasa, Ilmu Kebahasaan dan Ilmu Kesastraan dalam KI serta KD Pada Standar Isi SMA Kelas XII Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Wajib dan Peminatan. Skirpsi pada FKIP Universitas Kuningan: tidak diterbitkan.

Gunawan, Imam dan Palupi, A.R. (2014).“Revisi Ranah Kognitif: Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Penilaian” dalam Taksosomi Bloom [online], 25 halaman.

Tersedia: http://ejournal.ikippgrimadiun.ac.id/id/mode/405.html [13 Januari 2015]

Sudrajat, Akhmad. (2014). Permendikbud Kurikulum [online]. Tersedia: http://akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/07-a-salinan-permendikbud-no-69-th-2013-ttg-ttg-kd-dan-struktur-kurikulum-sma-ma.pdf [10 Desember 2014]

. (2014). Permendikbud Kurikulum [online].Tersedia:http://akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/01-b-salinan-lampiran-permendikbud-no-54-tahun-2013-ttg-skl.pdf [10 Desember 2014]

Utari, Ratno.(2014). “Takosonomi Bloom Bagaimana Cara Menggunakannya” dalam Taksonomi Bloom [online], 13 halaman.Tersedia: http://bppk.depkeu.go.id/webpkn/attachement.html [13 Januari 2015]

Published

04-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF SK AND KD IN THE 2006 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS WITH KI AND KD IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE SUBJECT FOR GRADE XII HIGH SCHOOL SEEN FROM THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES, SCOPE OF LANGUAGE SKILLS,. (2025). Fon: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/yc47k715