COMPARISON OF SK AND KD IN THE 2006 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS WITH KI AND KD IN THE 2013 CURRICULUM CONTENT STANDARDS FOR THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE SUBJECT FOR GRADE XI HIGH SCHOOL SEEN FROM THE TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES, SCOPE OF LANGUAGE SKILLS,
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/4vfkag46Keywords:
2006 curriculum content standards and 2013 curriculum, Indonesian language subjectsAbstract
The title of this research is Comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language Subjects for Senior High School Grade XI Viewed from the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives, Scope of Language Skills, Linguistics and Literature. Problem formulation: 1) how is the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Senior High School Grade XI?; 2) how is the taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Senior High School Grade XI?; 3) how is the comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for Indonesian Language subjects for Senior High School Grade XI?; 4) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XI of Senior High School in terms of the scope of Language Skills?; 5) How do the SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XI of Senior High School in terms of the scope of Linguistics?; 6) How do the SKKD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards compare with the KIKD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for grade XI of Senior High School in terms of the scope of literary science? This study aims to 1) determine the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for senior high school grade XI, 2) determine the taxonomy of learning objectives in KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian Language subject for senior high school grade XI, 3) determine the comparison of the taxonomy of learning objectives in SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the Indonesian Language subject for senior high school grade XI, 4) determine the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian Language subject for senior high school grade XI seen from the scope of language skills, 5) determine the comparison of SK and KD in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with KI and KD in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian Language subject for senior high school grade XI seen from the scope of science linguistics, 6) to compare the Competency Standards (SK) and Basic Competencies (KD) in the 2006 Curriculum Content Standards with the Core Competencies (KI) and Basic Competencies (KD) in the 2013 Curriculum Content Standards for the compulsory Indonesian language subject for senior high school grade XI, as seen from the scope of literature. The method used was descriptive qualitative. The conclusion of this study is that the taxonomy of learning objectives contained in the SKKD Curriculum 2006 is more dominant in the cognitive domain at the understanding level (C2). Meanwhile, the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives contained in the KIKD Curriculum 2013 for the Indonesian language subject for senior high school grade XI (compulsory) is more dominant in the cognitive domain at the application level (C3). Therefore, when comparing the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives contained in the SKKD Curriculum 2006 and KIKD Curriculum 2013, both dominate the cognitive domain, the only difference being the levels. The language skills covered in the SKKD and KIKD for Indonesian language for grade XI senior high school are predominantly speaking and writing. The linguistics skills covered in the SKKD for Indonesian language for grade XI senior high school are predominantly semantics, while the KIKD for compulsory Indonesian language for grade XI senior high school covers all linguistics areas equally. The literature skills covered in the SKKD for Indonesian language for grade XI senior high school and the KIKD for compulsory Indonesian language for grade XI senior high school are predominantly dramatic literature (film/drama).
Keywords: comparison, taxonomy of learning objectives, language skills, linguistics, literary science, Indonesian language for grade XI senior high school, 2006 curriculum content standards, 2013 curriculum content standards.
Downloads
References
Ahyadi, Didi. (2011). Linguistik Umum. Kuningan. Universitas Kuningan.
Arifin, E. Zaenal dan S. Amran Tasai. (2009). Cermat Berbahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: AKAPRES.
Chaer, Abdul .(2009). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
__________ .(2009). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2010). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Heryadi, Dedi. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: Pustaka Billah.
Hidayat, Sholeh. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya. IKAPI.(2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia tentang SISDIKNAS (Sistem Pendidikan Nasional). Bandung: Fokusmedia.
J.Waluyo, Herman. (1995). Teori dan Apresiasi Puisi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Keraf, Gorys. (1984). Tata Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Nusa Indah.
Kosasih, Engkos dan Hermawan, Wawan. (2012). Bahasa Indonesia (Berbasis Kepenulisan Karya Ilmiah dan Jurnal). Bandung: CV. Thursina.
Mulyasa, E. (2011).Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja.
Muslich, Masnur. (2012). Fonologi Bahasa Indonesia: Tinjauan Deskriptif Sistem Bunyi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Mutiadi , Ahmad Dedi. (2012). Menyimak&Pengajarannya. Kuningan: Universitas Kuningan.
Muzamiroh, Mida Latifatul. (2013). Kupas Tuntas Kurikulum 2013. Kata Pena.
Nurgiantoro, Burhan. (2010). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: BEFE-Yogyakarta.
Pateda, Mansoer. (1994). Linguistik (SebuahPengantar). Bandung: Angkasa.
Pidarta, Made. (2007). Landasan Pendidikan (Stimulus Pendidik Bercorak Indonesia.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ramlan. (2005). Sintaksis. Yogyakarta: CV. Karyono.
. (2009). Morfologi: Suatu Tinjauan Deskrptif. Yogyakarta: CV. Karyono.
Sanjaya, Wina. (2008). Kurikulum Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
. (2013). Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sugiantomas, Aan. (2011). Langkah Awal Menuju Apresiasi Sastra. Kuningan: Universitas Kuningan.
. (2012). Kajian Prosa Fiksi (Materi Perkuliahan) Kuningan: Universitas Kuningan.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. (2008). Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
. (2008). Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
. (2009). Pengajaran Sintaksis. Bandung: Angkasa.
TIM Penyusun. (2008). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta:Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
Ullmann, Stephen. (2012). Pengantar Semantik. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Belajar.
Nuraliyah, Ely. (2012). “Analisis Sk Dan Kd Pada Standar Isi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Berdasarkan Keterampilan Berbahasa, Ilmu Kebahasaan, Dan Ilmu Kesastraan (Sebuah Analisis Isi SK dan KD Mendengarkan, Berbicara, Membaca, dan Menulis)”. Skripsi pada FKIP Universitas Kuningan: tidak diterbitkan.
Wigunawa, Kemis. (2014). Analisis Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMA Sekabupaten Kuningan Dalam Menjabarkan SK/KD Dilihat Dari Ilmu Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Indonesia. Skripsi pada FKIP Universitas Kuningan: tidak diterbitkan.
Wulan, Sri. (2014). Cakupan Ilmu Keterampilan Bebahasa, Ilmu Kebahasaan dan Ilmu Kesastraan dalam KI serta KD Pada Standar Isi SMA Kelas XI Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Wajib dan Peminatan. Skirpsi pada FKIP Universitas Kuningan: tidak diterbitkan.
Gunawan, Imam dan Palupi, A.R. (2014).“Revisi Ranah Kognitif: Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran dan Penilaian” dalam Taksosomi Bloom [online], 25 halaman.
Tersedia: http://ejournal.ikippgrimadiun.ac.id/id/mode/405.html [13 Januari 2015]
Sudrajat, Akhmad. (2014). Permendikbud Kurikulum [online]. Tersedia: http://akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/07-a-salinan-permendikbud-no-69-th-2013-ttg-ttg-kd-dan-struktur-kurikulum-sma-ma.pdf [10 Desember 2014]
. (2014). Permendikbud Kurikulum [online].Tersedia:http://akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/01-b-salinan-lampiran-permendikbud-no-54-tahun-2013-ttg-skl.pdf [10 Desember 2014]
Utari, Ratno.(2014). “Takosonomi Bloom Bagaimana Cara Menggunakannya” dalam Taksonomi Bloom [online], 13 halaman.Tersedia: http://bppk.depkeu.go.id/webpkn/attachement.html [13 Januari 2015]
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.