THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE PHENOMENON IN THE EDUCATION DOMAIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/ps6rh113Keywords:
official language, education domain, sociolinguisticAbstract
This study aims to determine the situation of speech in the use use of official languages in the education domain. To fulfill that goal, this research uses descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The data source of this research is three videos from the youtube website namely; First, youtube Mwira Albarizi entitled Juara 2 Video Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMPN Banjit. Second, youtube SDN 1 Pringsewu Selatan entitled Video Rapat Dewan Guru SD Negeri 1 Pringsewu Selatan. Third, youtube Yoga 17 entitled Contoh Video Negosiasi (Tugas Bahasa Indonesia) X MIPA 2. The research data are in the form of words and sentences spoken by speakers and speech partners in the video. The technique of collecting data is done by listening-note it. Data analysis techniques used in this study are; (1) presenting data, (2) data reduction, and (3) drawing conclusions. The results of this study indicate that the use of official language in the education domain is determined from three situations namely, the role relationship, the place off speech, and the topic conversation. In the use of official languages in the education domain this role relationship occurs in educators with students, principals with the teacher council, and between friends. The scene of the speech occur in the education domain, such as in classroom, in meeting rooms, and in school environments. The topic of conversation was found to be appropriate for the use of official languages in the education domain.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). ProsedurPenelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Aziz, A. (2018). Landasan Pendidikan. Cirendeu Ciputat: HAJA Mandiri.
Gunawan, F. (2013). Implikasi Penggunaan Bahasa Gaul terhadap Pemakaian Bahasa Indonesia di Kalangan Siswa SMAN 3 Kendari . Al-Izzah, 8(1), 56–72.
Herisetyanti, T., Suharyati, H., & Rejeki, S. (2019). Ragam Bahasa dalam Komponen Tutur. Media Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Wahana. 25(2), 1–15.
Ibrahim, A. S. (2009). Kesemestaan Sosiolinguistik. Malang: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Universitas Negeri Malang.
Moleong, L. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mwira Albarizi. (30 Maret 2020). Juara 2 Video Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMPN BANJIT. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= ORTh-yz4j0U&t=459s
Rahardi, R. K. (2016). Manifestasi Wujud dan Makna Pragmatik Kefatisan Berbahasa dalam Ranah Pendidikan. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 226–245.
Rahayu, A. P. (2015). Menumbuhkan Bahasa Indonesia yang Baik dan Benar dalam Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. PARADIGMA, 2(1), 1–15.
Rahmawati, F. P., & Sumarlam. (2016). Variasi Bahasa pada Tayangan Kick Andy dalam Episode Ngelmu Sampai Mati. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 1(2), 137–145.
Ratna, N. K. (2013). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Saragih, D. K. (2018). Bahasa dan Ragam Bahasa pada Pendidikan Anak Sekolah. Paradigma Lingua, 6(2), 1–11.
Sartini, N. W. (2015). Perilaku Bahasa Diaspora Orang Bali di Jawa Timur: Kajian Sosiolinguistik. KEMBARA, 1(1), 54–62.
Sdn1 Pringsewu Selatan. (7 April 2020). Video Rapat Dewan Guru SD Negeri 1 Pringsewu Selatan. Youtube. https://youtu.be/I5vj- Bwialvl .
Sugeha, A. Z. (2017). Variasi Pilihan Bahasa pada Masyarakat di Kabupaten Probolinggo: Kajian Etnografis. Etnolingual, 1(1), 125–144.
Yoga 17. (7 April 2020). Contoh Video Negosiasi (Tugas Bahasa Indonesia) X MIPA 2. Youtube. https://youtu.be/PtSkNE9C2V4 .
Zulaeha, I. (2017). Strategi Pemertahanan Bahasa Daerah pada Ranah Pendidikan. Peradaban Melayu, 12, 40–46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
