THE URGENCY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIMODALITY-BASED CONTEXTUAL MORPHOLOGY TEACHING MATERIALS

Authors

  • Jasmine Belinda Budijanto Universitas Sanata Dharma Author
  • Yuliana Setyaningsih Universitas Sanata Dharma Author
  • R. Kunjana Rahardi Universitas Sanata Dharma Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/3n8v2y73

Keywords:

teaching materials, contextual morphology, multimodality

Abstract

This study aims to describe the urgency of developing multimodality-based contextual morphology teaching materials. This study uses a mix-method research. The subjects of this study were students and documents in the form of semester learning plans for morphology subjects. The data obtained are the results of filling out the questionnaire and the results of document analysis. Data collection techniques used are questionnaires and literature study. This study uses qualitative and quantitative in analyzing the data obtained. Questionnaire data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative, while the results of document analysis were analyzed using qualitative. Based on this research, the researcher found that students had difficulties in learning morphology. The biggest difficulty for students is learning morphemes, morphs, allomorphs, and affixations. To help students, there are several books that help, such as morphology textbooks and reference books. However, the textbook has not been integrated with multimodality so that students still have difficulty understanding morphology. Therefore, contextual and integrated morphology teaching materials are needed with multimodalities. With multimodality-based contextual morphology teaching materials, students will find it easier to understand morphology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami, E. (2016). Multimodality. Oxford Handbook of Language and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Akhyaruddin, Agusti, A., & Yusra, H. (2019). Analisis Morfofonemik Bahasa Melayu Jambi sebagai Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Morfologi Bahasa Indonesia. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2), 44–59.

Baryadi, I. P. (2011). Morfologi dalam Ilmu Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Penerbit USD.

Hermawan, B. (2021). Analisis Wacana Multimodalitas untuk Pemula. Bandung: UPI Press.

Jewitt, C., & Henriksen, B. (2019). Social Semiotics Multimodality. (1978).

Luca, I.-S. (2020). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis in Media. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 17(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/rjes-2020-0009

Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A.-L. (2019). Multimodality in Language Education – Implications for Teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127

Miladiyah, M. (2018). The Outcome of Multimodality on Language Teaching and Learning. 228(Klua), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.2991/klua-18.2018.51

Ramlan, M. (1980). Morfologi: Suatu Tinjauan Deskriptif. Yogyakarta: U.P. Karyono.

Rofi, A., Atmazaki, & Abdurahman. (2014). Pengembangan Buku Teks Pembelajaran Berbasis Kontekstual Dalam Materi Proses Morfologi Bahasa Indonesia Pada Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pembelajaran, 2(3).

Sari, Y. (2018). Multimodalitas dalam Gambar Iklan Luwak White Koffie Versi Lee Min-Ho”. Metalingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, 15(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.26499/metalingua.v15i2.73

Savitri, M. T., & Rosa, R. N. (2019). A Study of Multimodal Analysis in Smartphone Advertisement. Journal of English Language And Literature, 8(3), 231–240.

Suyudi, I. (2015). Kajian Terjemahan Komik “Peri Kenanga”: Sebuah Tinjauan Multimodalitas dan Analisis Wacana Kritis. UNS Journal of Language Studies, 4(1), 56–69.

Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., & Yusuf, W. F. B. M. (2013). Squaring literacy assessment with multimodal design: An analytic case for semiotic awareness. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(4), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X13504155

Published

04-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE URGENCY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTIMODALITY-BASED CONTEXTUAL MORPHOLOGY TEACHING MATERIALS. (2025). Fon: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 18(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.25134/3n8v2y73