VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT RUBRIC DEVELOPMENT WRITE PARAGRAPH AND NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION IN INDONESIAN LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25134/0ygsx378Keywords:
narrative and description paragraphs, assessment rubric, validityAbstract
This research is motivated by the importance of a valid assessment rubric as a guide in assessing student learning outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to determine the validity of the assessment rubric for writing narrative paragraphs and descriptions in Indonesian language learning. This type of research is quantitative research using the method of description. The data in this study are numbers obtained from validity questionnaires filled out by the validator. The validators in this study were two Indonesian language lecturers. The data collection technique was carried out by providing an assessment rubric for writing narrative paragraphs and descriptions as well as a questionnaire to the validator then the validator validated the given rubric based on the validation questionnaire that had been given. The results of the validation are used as data in this study. The findings in this study are as follows. (1) The validity of the assessment rubric for writing narrative paragraphs is 95 with a very valid category. (2) The validity of the assessment rubric for writing a descriptive paragraph is 96.25 with a very valid category. So, it can be concluded that the assessment rubric for writing narrative and persuasive paragraphs can be used to assess the results of learning to write paragraphs in Indonesian language learning.
Downloads
References
Alfianika, N, Atmazaki, dan Abdurahman (2014). Pengembangan model modul pembelajaran bahasa indonesia berbasis investigasi kelompok (group investigation) pada materi menulis karangan ilmiah siswa kelas xi sma n 8 padang. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pembelajaran, Volume 2 Nomor 2,Juni 2014.
Arikunto, S. (1988). Penilaian program pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bina Aksara.
Asrul, Rusydi, A, dan Rosnita. (2015). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Cita Pustaka. Media: Bandung.
Ayuningrum, D. (2016). Isolation and characterisation and antagonistic activity of bacteria symbionts hardcoral pavona sp. Isolated from panjang island, jepara against infectious multi-drug resistant (mdr) bacteria. Journal 2nd International Conference on Tropical and Coastal Region Eco Development.
Kamaruddin, A. (2014). Akuntansi manajemen. Edisi revisi. Cetakan. Kesembilan Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Khoirul, B dan Supahar. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran fisika berbasis stem. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Volume 22, No 2, Desember 2018(219-230)
Kurniawan, (2013). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogik, dan kompetensi professional. Guru. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Pustaka Belajar.
Mahirah, (2017). Evaluasi belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Idarah.Vol 1, No 2, Hal: 258.
Mahmudi, I. (2018). Rubrik analitik penilaian hasil belajar praktik pendidikan agama islam. Fikrah: Journal of Islamic Education, P-ISSN : 2599-1671, E-ISSN : 2599-168X
Matondang, Z. (2009) validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa Pps Unimed Vol.6 No.1, Juni 2009
Peraturan pemerintah nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP), pasal 43 ayat.
Permendiknas No. 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Kualifikasi Akademik dan Standar Kompetensi Guru.
Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Riscaputantri, A., & Wening, S. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian afektif siswa kelas iv sekolah dasar di kabupaten klaten. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 231-242.
Semi, M, A. (2003). Menulis efektif. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
Setiadi, A. (2016). Pemanfaatan media sosial untuk efektifitas komunikasi. Jurnal Humaniora Bina Sarana Informatika, Vol. 16 No. 2.
Setyawati, R, D, Nurina, H , dan Yanuar, H,R. (2017). Instrumen angket self-esteem mahasiswa ditinjau dari validitas dan reliabitas. Phenomenon. Jurnal Phenomenon, 2017, Vol. 07 (No. 2), pp. 174-186
Sudjana, N (2004). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugono, D. (20080. Kamus besar bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Suparmin, Usman, A, B, Ahmad, F. (2012). Validitas, reliabilitas, dan kepraktisan ujian melalui observasi dan bentuk lisan bagi kelas besar pada prodi pai fakultas tarbiyah dan bahasa IAIN Surakarta. Jurnal Kodifikasia, Volume 6 No. 1 Tahun 2012.
Suratinah, T. (2001). Anak super normal dan program pendidikannya. Jakarta: Bina aksara.
Suryabrata, S. (2000). Pengembangan alat ukur psikologis. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Yuniarti, N dan Soenarto (2016). Validitas konstrak instrumen evaluasi outcome lembaga pendidikan guru vokasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Volume 20, No 2, Desember 2016(221-233).
Zainuddin, dkk (2012). Pengembangan modul fisika bumi-antariksa untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar mahasiswa prodi pendidikan fisika fkip unlam. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, (Online), Jilid. 27, No. 1,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
