DEVELOPMENT OF SYLLABUS AND TEACHING MATERIALS FOR COMPREHENSIVE LITERATION-BASED INDONESIAN COURSES

Authors

  • Maria Botifar IAIN Curup Author
  • Ifnaldi IAIN Curup Author
  • Ummul Khair IAIN Curup Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25134/9xjhe966

Keywords:

Indonesian, comprehensive literacy, teaching materials, syllabus

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This research aims to produce syllabus products and teaching materials for comprehensive literacy-based Indonesian courses. Students need learning Indonesian at a high level of application for the development of linguistic competence, while the syllabus and previous teaching materials focused more on developing cognitive aspects only. For this reason, it is important to carry out research on the syllabus and teaching materials. This research was conducted using a development method that adopted the development of Borg and Gall with its implementation in three stages of development, namely the needs analysis stage, the existing document analysis stage, and the product development stage. Each stage of development uses data collection techniques in the form of observation techniques, interviews and questionnaires. Data analysis used qualitative data analysis, namely data reduction, data presentation and verification as well as quantitative data analysis in the form of average scores and percentages. The research results obtained are 1) lecturers' needs, namely a) needs related to learning objectives that make Indonesian a unifying and knowledge-traveling tool, b) material related to text development, exploration of the world of literature, proposal design and results as well as journal articles and Mendeley, OJS and Google Scholar applications, c) 21st century literacy and skills-based methods and learning, and d) class-based evaluation. 2) the needs of students in the development of learning that improves aspects of cognitive, psychomotor and affective competence. 3) Product development in the form of a syllabus and teaching materials implemented in objectives that include cognitive, psychomotor and affective aspects, material based on the development of academic writing competence, text-based methods and approaches, and class-based evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction, (Seven Edit). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Brian Tomlinson. (2013). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. New York: Bloomsbury publishing.

Botifar, Maria. (2015). Problem Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Penulisan Skripsi Mahasiswa Prodi PGMI Angkatan 2010-2011. Skripsi.

Buku Sumber bagi Dosen LPTK Pembelajaran Literasi Kelas Awal di LPTK (Jakarta: USAID, 2014).

Direktorat Pembelajaran, Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan, Panduan Program Insentif Bahan Ajar dan Pedoman Pembelajaran (Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 2006), h.3-4

Eithne Kennedy, et.al. (2012). Literacy In Early Childhood and Primary Education (3-8 years) Dublin,

Frydenberg, M., & Andone, D. (2011). Learning for 21 st Century Skills, 314–318.

Irwin S. Kirsch, , Ann Jungeblut, Lynn Jenkins, & Andrew Kolstad. 1993. Adult Literacy in America. (Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.

John W. Creswell. (2008). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluatin, Qualitative and Quantitative Research, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Jack C. Richards. (2005). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. USA:Cambridge University Press.

Magdahalena Tjalla dkk, The Analysis of EFL Students’ Needs for Writing Materials Development, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2015): 78.96 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Volume 6 Issue 8, August 2017 www.ijsr.net Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY. DOI: 10.21275/ART20175922. h. 313

Nasution,S. (2008). Asas-asas Kurikulum. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.

Richard Kern. (2000). Literacy and Language Teaching.(Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Seyedeh Maryam Meraji, Mustafa Zamanian, Incorporation of L1 culture into second language materials development: Benefits vs Risks (Elsevier: Procedia ocial and Behavioral Sciences, 2014)

Sanjaya,Wina. (2011). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Tashakkori, Abbas dan Charles Teddlie. (2010). Mixed Methodology. Pustaka pelajar: Yogyakarta.

Walter Dick, Carey Lou. (1996). The Systematic Design of Introduction, New York: Longman

Wagner, T. (2010). Overcoming The Global Achievement Gap(online). Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University

Westberg, L., McShane, S., & Smith, L. (2006). Matriks Literasi Rentang Hidup Verizon: Hasil, Pengukuran, dan Praktik dan Strategi Berbasis Penelitian yang Relevan. Washington D.C.

Arifin, Zainal. (2014). Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Published

04-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

DEVELOPMENT OF SYLLABUS AND TEACHING MATERIALS FOR COMPREHENSIVE LITERATION-BASED INDONESIAN COURSES. (2025). Fon: Journal of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, 20(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.25134/9xjhe966